
Tracking HRV has emerged as one of the best ways to quantify recovery.
Colorado-based triathlon coach Alan Couzens has a love-hate relationship with the rise of heart-rate variability tracking, or the ability to measure the variation between one’s heart beats. HRV unlocks high-level information about how well an athlete is recovering, as well as how ready they might be for their next big workout. But the problem is, while the tech to measure HRV has gotten simple and inexpensive—an app linked to your phone’s camera or a heart rate chest strap is all you need—analyzing the data is still complicated and requires patience and understanding.
More than 50 years ago, scientists discovered that the more variation in the time between someone’s heartbeats, the healthier the heart is. More variability indicates your heart is reacting well to the second-by-second changes in your body, such as the peaks and valleys in oxygen when you inhale and exhale. “Another way to look at it is that HRV is a good indicator of whether your central nervous system is in a fight or flight mode [low variation] or a rest and repair mode [high variation],” says Couzens.
HRV unlocks high-level information about how well an athlete is recovering, as well as how ready they might be for their next big workout.
Over the last 20 years, elite trainers have begun to use this data to measure how well their athletes recover from big workouts. We all have fluctuations in our HRV, but consistent readings of high variation are a strong indication of good recovery and the heart’s readiness to take on another training block. Yet until recently, tracking HRV required complex, expensive equipment and was often only used by pro or Olympic-level endurance athletes. Now, there are dozens of HRV-specific apps on the market (the function has been added to many fitness and sleep wearables) and they have become a popular tool for endurance athletes who are hoping to quantify recovery.
Of course, the problem with selling a complex medical system that for decades was only used by trained professionals in a lab setting is that things get oversimplified quickly. “The strength of the technology is its sensitivity. But if you don’t have a deep understanding of it, it’s hard to get a sense of where you stand relative to the norm,” says Couzens. “I see a lot of athletes using the info before they’ve established a baseline. Knowing your own patterns and baseline is how you will know which is correct.”
Most HRV apps, like SweetBeat or HRV4Training, take your pulse via your phone’s camera or heart rate chest strap and spit out a score between one and 100, with most readings falling somewhere between 50 and 100. And while HRV is highly individual, scores near 50 indicate less variation and some fatigue, says Couzens. But this has led many amateur athletes to see high numbers as good and low ones as bad. But in reality, for an athletic application, it’s not necessarily how high or low your number is that's revealing—it’s the consistency of your particular HRV score over several days or even weeks. This is because your personalized score is actually based on some fairly complex algorithms, and, unlike something like resting heart rate, understanding your HRV norm is what turns the tech into a tool for determining how well you’ve recovered from your last session, and thus how intense your next session should be.
We asked Couzens to give us a basic rundown of things to look out for when measuring your own HRV: